Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20127 (CHH)

JAGBANDHU SONWANI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1169/2023 · 2025-08-19

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:42028-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1169 of 2023 Jagbandhu Sonwani S/o Shri Puniram Sonwani Aged About 36 Years Occupation - Agriculture, Presently Working As Sarpanch At Gram Panchayat Paraskol, R/o Village Paraskol, Police Station Kosir, Tahsil - Sarangarh, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, District Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.), Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Kosir, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Xyz (The Details Of The Victim Is Being Filed In The Sealed Envelope) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 20.08.2025 1. Heard Mr. Roop Ram Naik, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Sakib Ahmed, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.08.22 11:27:40 +0530 2 No.1 / State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition and set aside/ quash the FIR/Crime No.116/2020 and final report registered by Police Station Kosir, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) against the petitioner/accused for offence under Section 354, 506, 323 of IPC (Annexure P-1) and also set aside the criminal proceeding vide Criminal Case No. 268/2021 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) (Annexure P-2) and this Hon'ble court may passed appropriate order which may deems fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned State counsel submits that the matter if fixed for framing of charge on 12.09.2025, hence no interference is sought for at this stage. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the concerned trial Court for discharge. 5. In view of the same, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to take recourse to law. 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet