NAKCHHED v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/9857/2025 · 2025-10-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201266 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201266 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9857 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Sri Sandeep Kumar Pandey who appears for the informant.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.66 of 2025 under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 333, 105, 110 and 117(2) BNS, P.S. Umri Begumganj, District Gonda.
3. In terms of the FIR, lodged on 24.03.2025, it was alleged that all the accused including the applicant had entered inside the home and the informant was badly beaten with the use of fist etc, subsequently, during treatment, the victim died on account of the injuries sustained on the right side back of the head and thereafter section 105 BNS was added.
4. Considering the fact that the applicant is aged about 74 years and there are no specific allegation against the applicant of causing injuries coupled with the fact that there is one case against the applicant which is a minor offence, the applicant who is in custody since 13.08.2025 is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.
5. Let the applicant Nakchhed be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nakchhed .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 14, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 9857 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench