Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201246 (ALL)

PARVEZ ALAM @ PARVESH ALAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

/1481/2025 · 2025-10-14

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1481 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and Sri Amit Kumar Awasthi who appears for the informant. 2. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR/Case Crime No.229 of 2025 under section 69, 351(2) BNS, P.S. Sharda Nagar, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the informant who is aged about 22 years was enticed by the applicant on false pretext marriage and physical relations were formed for the last one year and now he was refusing to marry her. In somewhat similar statements were made under section 180 and 183 BNSS. 4. Learned AGA opposes the bail application. 5. Considering the age of the applicant and the fact that physical relations were continued over a span of one year, a case for anticipatory bail is made out. 6. Thus, it is directed that the applicant Parvez Alam @ Parvesh Alam shall not be arrested in pursuance of the aforesaid FIR in question, on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.30,000/- to the satisfaction of Station Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Azmi Yousuf Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Parvez Alam @ Parvesh Alam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) House Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) That the accused-applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by police authorities as and when required and will cooperate with the investigation; (ii) That the accused-applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; and (iii) That the accused-applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. 7. The anticipatory bail application stands disposed off. October 14, 2025 VNP/- NABAIL No. 1481 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench