NILAM KUREEL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/12102/2025 · 2025-10-14
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201243 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201243 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12102 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that she may be permitted to implead the Secretary, Basic Education Board, Prayagraj as opposite party no. 5 in the array of opposite parties during the course of the day. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection to the same. In view of the aforesaid and looking to the fact that Secretary, Basic Education Board, Prayagraj is an essential party, therefore,learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Secretary, Basic Education Board, Prayagraj, as opposite party no. 5 in the array of opposite parties during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the opposite parties no. 1,2 & 4, Sri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3 and Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.
5. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs :-
"1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opp. party no. 2 and 3 for recounting/re-check marks of petitioner and ensure the appointment of the petitioner, according to the notification passed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Farooq Ayoob, Mansi Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kumar Ayush Nilam Kureel .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
the Basic Siksha Prishad, Prayagraj of State Government.
11. Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing to the opp. party no. 2 & 3 disposal of the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2024, 24.09.2024 and again on dated 27.01.2025, 18.08.2025 as early as possible in the interest of justice. (Contained as Annexure no. 2 of this writ petition)." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 5/Secretary, Basic Education Board, Prayagraj and the opposite party no. 5 may be directed to consider and decide the same within a stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the
contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims before the opposite party no. 5/Secretary, Basic Education Board, Prayagraj, within a period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 5 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of three months, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby
disposed of. October 14, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12102 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench