IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 652 of 2024 ---------- Udai Pratap Singh, son of late Manoranjan Singh, resident of Sudna Gayatri Mandir Road, P.O. Sudna, P.S. Daltonganj, now Medninagar, Dist. Palamau (Jharkhand). … … Petitioner - V E R S U S – 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. Mr. Bal Krishna Munda, the Commissioner, Palamau, P.O. and P.S. Daltonganj, now Medninagar, Dist. Palamau (Jharkhand). 3. Ms. Kavita, the Director, Primary Education, Department of Schooling and Literacy, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, Dist. Ranchi. 4. Mr. S.P. Singh, the District Superintendent of Education, Latehar, P.O. and P.S. Latehar, now Medninagar, Dist. Latehar (Jharkhand). …….. Opp. Parties. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurav Arun, Advocate Mr. Bhanu Kumar No. 1, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, AC to Sr.SC-I ---------- 05/ 07.01.2025 Heard the parties. It has been very fairly submitted by learned counsel for the opposite parties that the order of this Court has already been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the same. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties it appears that substantial compliance has been made. As such, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the same is dropped. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. However, petitioner is at liberty to move before the appropriate forum if any grievance still remains to be adjudicated. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) kunal