HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9371 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the order passed by the Sub District Magistrate Tehsil Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar on 19/08/2025 with correction contained as Annexure no. 1 and stay on the proceeding and implementation of the computerized supervision no. T202004040202368; "Parashuram versus Bhavnath" connected with computerized supervision no. T202104040200711; "Asharam and others versus Bhavnath and others" respectively as well as order passed by Tahsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar computerized case no. T198504040200001; Asharfa Devi versus Sahabdeen, contained as Annexure no. 1 and 2, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandumus directing and commanding to Opposite Party 3 to decide the computerized supervision no. T202004040202368; "Parashuram versus Bhavnath" connected with computerized supervision no. T202104040200711; "Asharam and others versus Bhavnath and others" respectively in the light of the order passed by the SOC as well as DDC, District Ambedkar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashwini Kumar, Raghvendra Verma, Ram Suphal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Asharam Verma Alias Asharam And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Nagar on 30/06/2025 and 09/07/2025 respectively annexed as Annexure No. 3 and 4 respectively with this writ petition, in the interest of justice." 3. Upon hearing counsel for the parties, we are of the view that since there is alternative efficacious remedy available under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the petitioners should be relegated to the same. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to file a revision before the authority concerned within a period of two weeks. If such a revision is filed within a period of two weeks, the authority concerned is directed to pass a reasoned order, after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of said revision. October 14, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- WRIC No. 9371 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench