Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20123 (AP)

PASUPULETI CHANDRASEKHAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLRC/650/2025 · 2025-08-17

Y Lakshmana Rao

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.650 of 2025 Dated 18.08.2025 APHC010282132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 650/2025 Between: Pasupuleti Chandrasekhar ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Venkata Mohan Rao Pathakota Counsel for the Respondent(S): Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER: Criminal Revision Case is filed challenging the order of formal returning the petition which was filed seeking for extension of time granted by the learned Trial Court in Crl.M.P.No.133 of 2024 in C.A.No.219 of 2024 on the file of the learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bapatla. 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.650 of 2025 Dated 18.08.2025 2. The learned Appellate Court granted time to the petitioner to deposit 10% of the compensation awarded by the learned Trial Court on or before 10.12.2024. The petitioner without bringing same to the notice of the learned Appellate Court about the maintainability of the petition has filed straightaway the revision case. Nothing remains in this revision case for adjudication because it was only a formal return of the petition filed for seeking extension of time. Had there been any order passed by the learned Trial Court, definitely there would have been a cause for determination in this revision case. The petitioner ought to have represented the petition with relevant citations. 3. For the above reasons, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of, requiring the petitioner to represent the petition which was returned relying on the decisions, if any. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt:18.08.2025 KMS 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.650 of 2025 Dated 18.08.2025 86 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 650/2025 18.08.2025 W KMS