RAGHAV RAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR/ DISTT. MAGISTRATE AYODHYA AND 8 OTHERS
/1066/2025 · 2025-10-14
Subhash Vidyarthi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201224 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201224 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1066 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Ganga Prasad Mishra, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vikas Ria, the learned State Counsel.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus for removal of encroachment of land bearing gata No.150 measuring area 0.0017 hectares situated in village Asthana, Tehsil Milkipur, District- Ayodhya.
3. On the basis of written instruction as provided by the SDM, Milkipur, Ayodhya, the learned State Counsel has informed the Court that a civil suit regarding the land in question has already been subjudice and, therefore, the administrative authorities cannot take any action during pendency of the civil suit.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission made in the instructions, there is no ground to interfere in this public interest litigation which is dismissed accordingly.
October 14, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganga Prasad Mishra, Abhinav Mishra, Shivam Dixit Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Raghav Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector/ Distt. Magistrate Ayodhya And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench