HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 945 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Case called out. None is present on behalf of the parties, except learned Additional Government Advocate. 2. This Court had passed the following order on 12.02.2024:- "Heard. By means of this petition, the petitioners have sought quashing of FIR dated 24.10.2023 bearing case Crime No. 0581 of 2023, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 377 IPC and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at Police Station Madiyaon, District Lucknow. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are agreeable for mediation and as a gesture of their bonafide, he says that the petitioners will deposit Rs. 15,000/- within one week. Let notice be issued to opposite party no. 4 through the opposite party no. 3, meaning thereby, the petitioners will provide dasti notice to opposite party no. 3 - Station House Officer, Police Station Madiyaon, District Lucknow who in turn will serve it upon opposite party no. 4. The opposite party no. 3 will file affidavit of service on the next date. Learned AGA shall ensure service of notice. The Court will consider release of amount or part thereof as soon as the opposite party no. 4 puts in appearance before the Court. In view of the aforesaid, it is hereby provided that the petitioners shall not be arrested on the basis of the impugned FIR till next date of listing. They shall, however, get their statements recorded before the Investigating Officer as and when they are called. The Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Pratap Singh Yadav, Beena Mishra, Vimlesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Satyendra Singh Anshu Gupta And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) investigation shall go on. List this matter on 14.03.2024." 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, Rs.15,000/- was not deposited by the petitioners within the stipulated period. Thereafter, an application for extension of time for depositing the said amount was moved, on which, three days further time was granted by means of the order dated 27.02.2024. Even thereafter, the amount was not deposited and another application for extension of time was moved, but none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the said application. Therefore, this Court by means of the order dated 05.03.2024 directed to put up the case day after tomorrow i.e. on 07.03.2024 but even thereafter, none appeared and when the case was taken up, it was directed to be listed in the week commencing 15.04.2024. 4. In view of above, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter, may be because, this petition has rendered infructuous. 5.Dismissed accordingly. October 14, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 945 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench