Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201218 (ALL)

BIPIN YADAV AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/8754/2025 · 2025-10-14

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8754 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Sri Vijay Kumar Yadav, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "(अ) यह िक याचीगण, सम्मानीय न्यायालय से िवन्ा िनवदेन करते है, िक वाद सं0- 24615/2020, मु0अ0सं0- 494/2019, सरकार बनाम बेचेलाल यादव आिद, अन्तर्गत धारा 498ए, 323, 504, 506 भ०दं० सं० तथा 3/4 डी०पी० एक्ट, थाना कृ ष्णानगर लखनऊ, न्यायालय ्शीमान अपर मुख्य न्याियक मिजस््िेट सप्तम क्ष सं०:-31 लखनऊ में िवचाराधीन वाद तथा आरोप-प्ऴ संलग्नक सं0-2 व संलग्नक सं0-3 सम्मिनग आदेश िदनांक- 09.07.2020 को िनरस्त िकये जाने का आदेश पािरत करने की कृ पा करें। (ब) यह िक वाद सं0-24615/2020, मु0अ0सं0-494/2019, सरकार बनाम बेचेलाल यादव आिद, अन्तर्गत धारा 498ए, 323, 504, 506 भ०दं०सं० तथा 3/4 डी०पी० एक्ट, थाना कृ ष्णानगर लखनऊ, न्यायालय ्शीमान अपर मुख्य न्याियक मिजस््िेट सप्तम क्ष सं0- 31 लखनऊ में िवचाराधीन है िजसमें तारीख पेशीः-10.11.2025 है, यािचका के िनस्तारण तक कायर्वाही स्थिगत करने की कृ पा करें।" 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramkripal Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Bipin Yadav And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. October 14, 2025 Anurag A482 No. 8754 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench