Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20120 (GAU)

BHANWARILAL SWAMI and ANR v. M/S CHOUTHMAL RADHAKISHAN and ANR.

CRP/17/2014 · 2025-02-10

Marli Vankung

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010224642014 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP/17/2014 BHANWARILAL SWAMI and ANR S/O- LT. SEWNARAYAN SWAMI, PROP. OF M/S. TINSUKIA TRANSPORT CORPORATION. 2: M/S TINSUKIA TRANSPORT CORPORATION A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN BOTH OF CHIRWAPATTY TINSUKIA TOWN DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM VERSUS M/S CHOUTHMAL RADHAKISHAN and ANR. A HUF, HAVING RESPONDENT NO. 2 AS THE PRESENT KARTA THEREOF. 2:RADHAKISHAN BAHETY S/O- LT. BHURAMAL BAHETY THE KARTA OF THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 BOTH OF CHIRWAPATTY TINSUKIA TOWN DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.A TALUKDAR, MR.K RAJBONGSHI,MR.R P N SINGH,MR.S P ROY Advocate for the Respondent : MR.P MAHANTA, MR.T C KHETRI,MR.R K BORTHAKUR,MS.P SAHARIA Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER Date : 11.02.2025 Ms. P. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioners, who submits that during the pendency of the present Civil Revision Petition, the matter has become infructuous and has prayed that the instant Civil Revision Petition may be disposed of. As prayed for, the Civil Revision Petition on becoming infructuous stands disposed of. Original LCR is to be returned. JUDGE Comparing Assistant