HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 4907 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Yashonidhi Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue and perused the record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the Adjudication Order dated 20.02.2025 passed under Section 73 of the U.P.G.S.T. Act passed by respondent no. 2 creating a demand of tax of Rs. 2,56,165.58/- for the F.Y. 2020-21. 3. Submissions have been advanced as have already been considered in large number of similar petitions. Primarily, we have considered and dealt with the same in Writ Tax No. 3964 of 2025 (M/S Riya Construction Vs. State of U.P. & 3 Ors., Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:179271- DB, dated 09.10.2025. 4. Facts being similar, writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside, subject to the petitioner depositing Rs. 26,000/- towards the disputed amount (including the amount that may have already been deposited or recovered from the petitioner) within a period of one month from today, with the following directions: (i) Subject to the above deposit being made by the petitioner, the Adjudicating Authority shall make available to the petitioner copy of the show cause notice together with any additional/supplementary notice etc issued in these proceedings together with copies of Relied Upon Documents ('RUDs' in short) within a period of two weeks from the date Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vedika Nath, Yashonidhi Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. M/S Rich Dot .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) of compliance shown by the petitioner. (ii) Petitioner shall file reply, if any, within a further period of four weeks therefrom. (iii) Thereupon the respondent no. 2 shall fix appropriate date for hearing and communicate the same to the petitioner in the manner prescribed by law with at least two weeks' advance notice. (iv) Petitioner undertakes to cooperate and participate in the proceedings and not seek any undue or long adjournment. 5. It is expected that the proceedings thus remitted would be concluded within six months from the date the petitioner makes first compliance under this order and deposits the amount specified above. 6. The amount so deposited by the petitioner shall remain subject to the final outcome of the adjudication proceedings. October 15, 2025 Prakhar WTAX No. 4907 of 2025 2 (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAKHAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad