HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10044 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the application dated 16.07.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the application of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2/ District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid application of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all other relevant parties. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 14, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Singh, Ravi Kant Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Sanjay Kumar Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench