Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201162 (ALL)

PRANSHU PANDEY @ PRIYANSHU PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/7354/2025 · 2025-10-14

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7354 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.82 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 64(2M) BNS and Sections 5L/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Balrampur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that some unknown person have enticed the daughter of the informant aged about 15 years. Subsequently in the statement under Section 183 BNSS the applicant stated that she knew the applicant and had gone with him on various occasions. Subsequently she had gone with the applicant to Ranchi and thereafter both of them stayed back for one month and physical relations were also formed. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the said statement and the fact that there is no definite documents regarding the exact age of the applicant at this stage, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 2.4.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Pranshu Pandey @ Priyanshu Pandey be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kr. Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pranshu Pandey @ Priyanshu Pandey .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 14, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 7354 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench