ALOK PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
/1689/2024 · 2025-10-14
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201154 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201154 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1689 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Case called out. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
2. This Court had passed following order on 11.03.2024 :-
"Perused the contents of the averments in the writ petition, specially paragraph 14. The allegations are serious, the truth whereof is required to be ascertained. Superintendent of Police, Unnao shall get the matter inquired by an officer not below the rank of Additional Superintendent of Police and submit report in a sealed cover. Petitioner and all others, who are involved shall be heard in this regard. Put up on 15.04.2024, as fresh."
3. In deference to the aforesaid order, learned AGA has produced the inquiry report in a sealed cover sent by the Additional Superintendent of Police (North), Unnao, which has been opened. Inquiry report dated 10.04.2024 addressed by the Additional Superintendent of Police (North), Unnao to the Superintendent of Police, Unnao indicates that inquiry has been made in regard to the allegations made by the petitioner in his application, however, the said allegations have not been found true.
4. The Bench Secretary is directed to get the aforesaid inquiry report dated Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Singh, Mahendra Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., O.P. Tiwari Alok Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
10.04.2024 sealed, which shall be kept on record.
5. Learned AGA and Shri O.P. Tiwari, learned Counsel for the opposite parties no. 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 18 submits that the petition itself is not maintainable because the petitioner has remedy under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, however, since allegations have not been found true, the application preferred by the petitioner before the Superintendent of Police, Unnao itself is misconceived.
6. Since none appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 14, 2025 Ajit CRLP No. 1689 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench