[2025:RJ-JP:23603] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6927/2025 1. Waris S/o Rujhdar, Aged 32 Years, R/o Village Paheri, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Currently In Sub Jail Deeg, Rajasthan). 2. Shahbaj S/o Khaleel, Aged 25 Years, R/o Pemakheda, Police Station Punhana, District Nuh, Haryana. (Currently In Sub Jail, Deeg, Rajasthan). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN(V. J.) Order 26/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.147/2025 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313, 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act, 2008. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that other co-accused persons of this case have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate bench of this court. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and [2025:RJ-JP:23603] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6927/2025] further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, especially the fact that other co-accused persons have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate bench of this court as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1) Waris S/o Rujhdar and 2) Shahbaj S/o Khaleel shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. [2025:RJ-JP:23603] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6927/2025] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 10. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN (V. J.)),J YOGESH/129