STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. MANAGING COMMITTEE, SHRI PRAGYA MAHAVIDYALAYA
SAW/703/2025 · 2025-09-03
Sanjeet Purohit, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20114 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20114 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35271-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 703/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12672/2020
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, College Education, Secretariat Jaipur.
2. Director, College Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. ----Appellants Versus
1. Managing Committee, Shri Pragya Mahavidyalaya, Bijainagar, Ajmer, Through Its General Secretary
2. Shri Pragya Mahavidyalaya, Ajmer, Through Its Principal Pragya College Bijaynagar, Ajmer 305001 (Raj.)
3. Dr. Madhu Jain D/o Sh. Khem Chand Jain, Aged About 54 Years, R/o K-70 A, Madan Villa, Krishanganj, Ajmer- 305001 Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Mr. Divyanshu Gupta & Mr. Chinmaya Saxena For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Order 03/09/2025
1. The appeal being belated, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed, wherein it is stated that the delay has occurred as on analyzing the facts and circumstances of each institution, it was found that they were already having the advantage of excess grant-in-aid and after making due assessment of the years-long record of the institutions, it was found that the order passed by learned Single Judge was erroneous in that sense and the impugned order is thereby required to be assailed.
2. We find the reasons to be wholly misconceived. The order dated 08.07.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge impugned
[2025:RJ-JP:35271-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-703/2025] before us in the appeal, is a consent order and it would be apposite to quote the order as under:-
"Since the issue involved in these writ petitions is common, they are being tagged. As agreed and requested by the learned counsels for the respective parties, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of order dated 17.02.2022 passed by this Court in S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No.300/2017 in SB Civil Writ Petition No.1556/2017: Managing Committee, S.S. Jain Subodh Shiksha Samiti & Anr. versus Om Prakash Verma & Anr. and other connected matters and modified by this Court vide order dated 14.10.2022 passed in S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No.226/2022 in SB Civil Writ Petition No.8665/2019: Managing Committee, Shri Pragya Mahavidyalaya, Bijainagar, Ajmer & Anr. versus Dr. Chandra Prakash Gupta & Anr. and other connected matters. Pending application(s), if any, also stands
disposed of. "
3. In view of above, we find that the learned Single Judge has only relied on the earlier orders passed and that too on the consent given by the counsel for the appellant, no error can be said to have been committed on merits as well on delay, appeal is dismissed.
4. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J AVINASH GULERIA /93