') 1. Mr. The same i 2. In th the Labour which the alongwith had remain 3. The order and respondent and she ha ! !"#$%&'()*$') " # $ # % #&# ''''' +) ,-+$(-)01#2 Mr. Arvind Seth has filed Vakalatna same is taken on record. In the present petition, the challenge abour Court, UT, Chandigarh dated 0 h the respondent-workman was gi gwith continuity in service even for th remained out of service but back wage The present writ petition was admi r and learned counsel for the p ondent-workman had already been g she has already retired from service. - 1 – ($.$*)') / ### () ) +) ,-+$(-) alatnama on behalf of the petitioner. allenge has been laid to the award of ated 01.01.1999 (Annexure P-2), by as given benefit of reinstatement for the period respondent-workman wages were denied. admitted and there was no interim the petitioner concedes that the een given benefit under the award . – oner. rd of by ment man terim the ward VINOD KUMAR 2025.02.07 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4. Kee been impl retired cou according continuity any interf petition is $"&3 4) .5 % * * Keeping in view the facts that the implemented since long and the r ed coupled with the fact that even rding to which the respondent-wo inuity of service, has been implement interference by this Court at this s is accordingly dismissed. 3 /0 * + , * ) - 2 – at the impugned award has already the respondent-workman has also even on merits, the earlier award, workman was reinstated with lemented, no ground is made out for this stage and hence, the present 1') +) ,-+$(-)2 &.,$ - % – eady also ard, with t for esent 2 VINOD KUMAR 2025.02.07 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document