J IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5874 OF 2025 Between : 1. Vedurupaka vl-nay Kumar, S/o. (Late) Veera Raju, Aged about 57 years, R/o. D.No 16 -918 /1, Srikanthnagar, Arilova, Visakhapatnam 2. Smt. Vedurupaka pavani, w/o. v. vinay Kumar, Aged about 45 years, R/o. D.No 16 -918 /1, Srikanthnagar, Arilova, Visakhapatnam Petitioners/Accused 1 & 2 AND The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, HI-gh Court of Andhra Pradesh Nelapadu, Amaravathi, Guntur District Respondent/Complainant Petition under sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, (New Sections 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed : rdseurpsp :nrf toefrlhse o:frl ::nc:Ilo:u£giE:%3n 'o:h eB NH:gsl :youerfn :raglnbge I::eaps:i:t[{oon eprasss/ Accused No. 1 and 2 on bail in cr.No. 41 / 2025, dt.- 7.3.2025 on the fI-le Of SHO, I Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam for the offence punishable Under Sections 318 (4) r/w. 3 (5) of BNS Act and Under Sec. 4 I/w. 56 of APCFA and Sections 21 (1 ), (2), (3) of TBUDS Act -2019 lan the interest OfJ-uStiCe COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : MS. MSVS SUDHA RANI COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER * » . de>rfe-+apL'rf``S:`7;f'*rJ+avi-,--a7-"aevtH®`ngivmjae QBBEB : Heard learned COunSel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Public prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners herein are arraigned aS accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.41 of 2025 of I town Police Station, Visakhapatnam, registered for the offence punishable under sections 318(4), read With 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha (for Short BNS) and Section 4 read with Section 56 of A.P.Chit Fund Act, 1971 and Section 21 (1)(2)(3) of the Banning of Unregu[ated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019. [t iS Submitted that the Petitioners Were arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody On 09.05.2025. 3. Learned COunSel for the Pet'ltiOnerS Submitted that Pet'ltiOner No.1 is the husband of petitioner No.2 and that the Petitioners have a mentally retarded son, as weH as an aged mother Who iS about 84 years old and bedridden. [t iS further submitted that the petitioners have been in judicial remand for more than 45 days. 4. Considering the Same, this Court is inclined tO grant ba'h With the following cOnditiOnS|.- i) The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 sha" be enlarged On bail On the'lr executing a personal bond for Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) each With two SuretleS for a like Sum each tO the satisfaction of the spec-lal Judge for Trial of Cases under Banning Of t=fiir-`_ I,. lJ -, =_RE I unregulated Deposi_I schemes, 2019-cum~PrI-nCiPaI DistrI'Ct & Sessions Judge, visakhapatnam. ii) The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall appear before the Investigating officer, I town police Station, Visakhapatnam on every second saturday between 10.-00 am to 12:00 Noon till completion of investI-gatiOn Or after filing charge sheet. iii) The petitI-Oners sha" not tamper with the evidence and hamper the I-nVeStigation and shall cooperate for I-nVeStigatI-On. With the above condI'tiOnS, the criminal peti{!-on is allowed. Ml'sceIIaneous petitions, if any pending, jn the criminal petitI-On Sha" Stand closed. E6 Lr5® //TRUE COPY sd/- K.TATA RAG DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To71 The Spec',al Judge for Trlal of Cases under Bannlng Of unregulated Deposlt Schemes, 2019-Gum-PrlnclPal Dlstrlct & SesslOnS Judge] VisakhaPatnam 2. The Superintendent, District Central JaU AdiviVaram, VisakhaPatnam 3. The SHO, I Town Police Stat'lon, VisakhaPatnam 4. One CC to MS. MSVS SUDHA RANI Advocate [OPUC] 5 Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, Hlgh Court Of A.P[OUT] a spare COPY HIGH COURT HN,J DATED.. 24/06/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.Nol5874 of 2025 ALLOWED I