Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20113 (CAL)

PRADIP KUMAR KARMAKAR v. ARABINDA PRAMANICK AND ORS

SAT/56/2024 · 2025-08-21

Acting, Biswaroop Chowdhury, Soumen Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item- 9. sg 19-09-2025 Ct. 16 SAT 56 of 2024 CAN 2 of 2025 Pradip Kumar Karmakar Versus Arabinda Pramanick & Ors. Mr. Purnendu Das Mrs. Gitika Mallik …for the appellant Mr. Sounak Bhattacharya Mr. Sounak Mandal Ms. Bipasha Bhattacharyya …for the respondents In Re: CAN 2 of 2025 1. The appeal is defective. The appellant has not removed the defect. 2. This is an application for restoration of the appeal and the application. The appeal and the application were dismissed for default on 21st August, 2025. However, the respondents appeared on that date. 3. We are satisfied with the explanations given by the petitioner for not being able to appear before the Court when the matter was taken up for hearing on 21st August, 2025 and the appeal and the application were dismissed for default. 4. In view thereof, the order dated 21st August, 2025 is recalled and the appeal and the application are restored to its original file and number with an assurance that the defects shall be removed on or before 26th September, 2025, in default, the appeal and the application shall stand dismissed without any reference to this Court. 5. In the event the defects are removed, the matter shall be listed in the Monthly List of November 2025. 6. CAN 2 of 2025 is, accordingly, disposed of. (Soumen Sen, J.) (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.) 2