BHARTIYA VIDYA NIKETAN SCHOOL BAGWALA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/8484/2025 · 2025-10-14
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201095 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201095 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 8484 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondent nos.1 and 3 and learned counsel for respondents nos. 2 and 4.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction be issued to the respondents authority to take appropriate steps forthwith to remove or replace the 11,000 Volt electricity supply line which is presently passing over the building of Bhartiya Vidya Niketan School, situated at Bagwala, District Etah. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.4 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Alok Mishra, C.S.C. Bhartiya Vidya Niketan School Bagwala .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.4-Executive Engineer, Dakshinanchal Power Corporation, Electricity Distribution Division II, Etah within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.4 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. October 15, 2025 Arif WRIC No. 8484 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad