Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20109 (JHR)

ANIL KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./2554/2018 · 2025-01-10

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. 2554 of 2018 Anil Kumar Das, aged about 45 years, Son of Sri Angad Das, resident of Village Bhabhua, Ward No.-13, P.O. & P.S. Bhabhua, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua), Bihar. ….. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Anuja Devi @ Pushpi, wife of Anil Kumar Das, daughter of Late Pramod Kumar, resident of H.I.-17, Harmu Housing Colony, Harmu, P.O. Harmu, P.S.- Argora, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. ….. Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA -------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Yadu Nandan Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Lily Sahay, A.P.P. --------- Order No. 08/Dated: 10th January, 2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present petition was filed against the rejection of the discharge petition vide order dated 09.02.2018 passed in Complaint Case No. 1069 of 2014 filed under Section 245 of Cr.P.C. and affirmed by the revisional Court vide its order dated 24.05.2018, but during pendency of this petition, charge has been framed against the petitioner. Accordingly, I.A. No. 1694 of 2024 has been filed in this petition challenging the order for charge framing dated 10.06.2019 and the same has been dismissed with the observation that order framing charge is a revisional order. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner wants to file revision against the order of framing charge and prays to withdraw this application. 3. Learned APP for the State has no objection. 4. In the facts and circumstances of this case, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Simran/