Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201088 (ALL)

RAMESH JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/33756/2025 · 2025-10-14

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33756 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 and Sri Narendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for respondents nos.2 & 3. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the electricity connection has been refused to him on the ground that the share of the petitioner in the property was sealed. It is stated that the claim of the petitioner for installation of a fresh electricity connection would be considered only after the sealing order is withdrawn. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by order dated 07.07.2025 passed by the Zonal Officer, Prayagraj Development Authority, Prayagraj, the sealing order has been withdrawn and the property has been desealed. It is further submitted that in view of the aforesaid subsequent development the petitioner has submitted a representation/application to respondent no.2 for grant of an electricity connection. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.2-Executive Engineer, Electricity Urban Distribution Division Rambag,1A, Kamla Nehru Road, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lok Nath Shukla, Raj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Narendra Kumar Tiwari Ramesh Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Prayagraj within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. October 15, 2025 Gaurav WRIC No. 33756 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad