Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20108 (HP)

SANJAY GUPTA v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/12169/2025 · 2025-07-31

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.12169of 2025 Date of Decision: 31.7.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Sanjay Gupta ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. A.K. Gupta and Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Precisely, the grouse of the petitioner, as has been highlighted in the petition and further canvassed by learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner herein has been granted work charge status in terms of judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Suraj Mani’s case as is evident from annexure P-1, but till date pay fixation has not been done. 2. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents fairly states that order of pay of fixation, if not already passed, shall be passed expeditiously, preferably, within two weeks. - 2 - 3. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and as such, present petition is disposed of alongwith pending application, if any. Needless to say, needful, as has been undertaken to be done by learned Additional Advocate General, shall be done within two weeks. July 31, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge