HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6125 of 2024 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner has submits that though the writ petition has been preferred to (i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to make the payment of honorarium to the petitioner from November, 2022 up till now and on each and every month when it fell due; (ii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 18.03.2024 pending before him by speaking and reasoned order and within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court; (iii) Issue any other writ order or direction in the like nature which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case; (iv) award the cots of the writ petition to the petitioner, but the same has rendered infructuous. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. October 15, 2025 Rajesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Divya .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad