Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20106 (JHR)

SUBHASH DORAI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6691/2025 · 2025-08-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:22669] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6691 of 2025 ------ Subhash Dorai, aged about 30 years, Son of Late Budhram Dorai, Resident of Ladupada, Post Karaikella, Police Station Karaikella, Dist.-West Singhbhum, State Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl P.P ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-08-08-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kharasawan P.S. Case No.30 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191 (2)/ 191(3) /190/115(2)/308(2)/351(2)/351(3)/352/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act and cognizance has been taken under Sections 191 (2)/191(3)/190/115(2)/308(2)/351(3)/352/61(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act and Sections 25(1- B)a/26/25(6)/35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the member of unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons, in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, voluntarily caused hurt and demanded extortion from the employees of the informant and by showing pistol, threatened that unless the extortion was paid, the members of the informant party will face dire consequences. It is further submitted that petitioner also handed one envelop to the labour and demanded 10 % of the whole amount of money involved in the concerned work, for his organization. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and he has not been put on T.I. Parade. It is further submitted that petitioner has been in jail custody since 30.03.2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is next submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by the Co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 24.07.2025 passed in B.A. No.6137 of 2025. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saraikella in connection with Kharasawan P.S. Case No.30 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/