KAMAL SINGH S/O BACHHU SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6920/2025 · 2025-09-18
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20104 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20104 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38391] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6920/2025 Kamal Singh S/o Bachhu Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Chillachound, Police Station Aangai, District Dholpur (Rajasthan) (Accused Presently Confined At District Jail Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Bharadwaj For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 18/09/2025
1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Kamal Singh S/o Bachhu Singh seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.05/2025 dated 06.01.2025 registered at P.S. Mansalpur District - Karauli, for the offence under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the
[2025:RJ-JP:38391] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-6920/2025] applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.
3.
Learned Counsel for Petitioner submits that instant case is registered after recovery of contraband from Ravi Kumar and Dhara Singh on 06.01.2025. He further submitted that recovered quantity is more than small quantity but lesser than commercial quantity. He further submitted that on the basis of statement of main accused from whom recovery is effected, present petitioner is arrayed as an accused under Section 8/29 of NDPS Act and Section 111(2) of BNS. He also submitted that six criminal cases were registered against petitioner and in all six criminal cases, petitioner is enlarged on bail. He also submitted that present petitioner is not involved in any of criminal cases but only on basis of information, he was arrayed as an accused. He also referred material on record and submitted that there is no evidence to show that petitioner is involved in conspiracy, abetment or financing of offence under NDPS Act. He also undertaken that petitioner accused will not repeat any offence and is ready to abide by any condition. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On the basis of recovery of contraband articles smack from Ravi Kumar and Dhara Singh on 06.01.2025, a report is
[2025:RJ-JP:38391] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-6920/2025] registered at PS Mansalpur and on the basis of information given by co-accused, present petitioner is arrayed as an accused as an abettor and main kingpin of organized gang. The petitioner accused is arrested on 27.02.2025 and since then he is in custody. A co-ordinate Bench while considering bail application of present petitioner on 28.07.2025 has granted bail where six criminal cases under the NDPS Act were registered against the petitioner. Based on the order passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, bail has also been granted to present petitioner on 07.08.2025 in another FIR. We have considered the orders submitted by learned counsel for petitioner and also the record summoned from office in which the petitioner accused is enlarged on bail. Considering the principle of parity, it is appropriate to allow this bail application, but if present petitioner is involved in any of the matter then this bail order will be recalled. 7.
Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Kamal Singh S/o Bachhu Singh, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with
[2025:RJ-JP:38391] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-6920/2025] two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) On 1st and 3rd Monday of every month, petitioner accused shall mark his attendance at PS Mansalpur- Karauli. After attendance, concerned police station shall forward the attendance to Learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases, Karauli. If it is found that petitioner accused has failed to mark his attendance, Learned Special Judge shall be at liberty to cancel the bail order. (iii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iv) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (v) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /78