HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9185 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. List of fresh cases has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition though learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel on behalf of respondent-bank are present. 2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the respondent-Bank that due to subsequent development, the present writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Since no one is present on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed in default. 4. Since the present order has been passed in the absence of the counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is free to move a recall application within 30 days from today. October 15, 2025 Gaurav Kuls Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajit Kumar Srivastava, C.S.C., Satish Chaturvedi (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Abdul Raheem Khan .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad