Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201031 (ALL)

RANI SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/10047/2025 · 2025-10-14

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10047 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present petition and prays that same may be dismissed as not pressed as the petitioner wants to avail other remedy available in law. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to avail other appropriate remedy available in law. October 15, 2025 Arif Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Tripathi, Shalandera Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Manoj Kumar Srivastava, C.S.C., Narendra Kumar Tiwari (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Rani Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad