Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20102 (RAJ)

YOGESH S/O SHRI KALURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6938/2025 · 2025-06-10

Anand Sharma V J

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23030] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6800/2025 Dharmendra Barala @ Kalu S/o Prahlad, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Railway Station Road, Ward No. 7, Guliyo Ki Deani, Police Station Chommu, District Jaipur. (Presently Petitioner Is In District Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6938/2025 Yogesh S/o Shri Kaluram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o House No. 20, Keriyo Ki Dhani, Vishvkarma, Police Station Vishvkarma, District Jaipur Presently Plot No. A 65, Shyam Vatika, Motukabas, Police Station Daulatpura, District Jaipur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Vijaywargia Mr. O.P. Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA (V. J.) Order 10/06/2025 These bail applications have been filed by the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. in respect of FIR No.103/2025 registered with Police Station Manoharpur, Jaipur [2025:RJ-JP:23030] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6800/2025] Rural for the offences under Sections 318(2), 318(4) & 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 63 & 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners would submit that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are under the Copyright Act and they have falsely been implicated in the instant case whereas, they have not committed any offence as alleged against them. The investigation has been virtually completed and no recovery is to be made against the accused- petitioners. They are behind the bars since 25.04.2025 and no more custodial interrogation is required from them. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. Considered the submissions made at Bar. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Accordingly, these bail applications are hereby allowed. The accused-petitioners (1) Dharmendra Barala @ Kalu S/o Prahlad and (2) Yogesh S/o Shri Kaluram shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No.103/2025 registered with Police Station Manoharpur, Jaipur Rural on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioners shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. [2025:RJ-JP:23030] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6800/2025] (ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is exempted by the trial Court. (ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)),J Ashish Kumar /122-123