1 2025:CGHC:21240-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2298 of 2025 1 - M/s Vikram Tele Infra Private Limited. Near Sadu School, L.I.G.-998, Housing Board Colony, Saddu, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.), Through Its Director, Shri Vijay Kumar Ratanchand Javeri, Aged About 53 Years, R/o A-704, Part Titanium, Park Street, Pune City, Maharastra- 411057 2 - Shri Vijay Kumar Ratanchand Javeri S/o Ratanchand Sardarmal Javeri Aged About 53 Years R/o A-704, Park Titanium, Park Street, Pune City, Maharastra- 411057, Director Of Vikra Teleinfra Private Limited, R/o A-704, Part Titanium, Park Street, Pune City, Maharastra- 411057 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Public Health Engineering, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Chief Secretary Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Secretariat, Mahanadi Complex, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur, (C.G.) 3 - The Chief Engineer Public Health Engineering, Raipur, District - Raipur, (C.G.) 4 - The Executive Engineer (Tender Cell) District Water And Sanitation Mission, Public Health Engineering Division, Koriya (Baikunthpur), District - Koriya (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Raza Ali, Advocate For Respondent / State : Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, Advocate General assisted by Mr. Shashank Thakur, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 0 8 . 05 .202 5 1. Heard Mr. Raza Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, Advocate General assisted by Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State/respondents. 2. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners seeking following reliefs : “A. A writ and/or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue calling for the records of the case pertaining the petitioners' case from the respondent concerned if this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. B. A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of certiorari do issue quashing the notice inviting tender (Annexure P-1) so far as it relates to work awarded to petitioners herein i.e. Tender No.316/07.04.2025 System No.166682, Ghutra Group Multi Village Water Supply Scheme at Manendragarh, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur, being illegal, arbitrary and in gross violation of petitioners' fundamental, constitutional and contractual rights under the agreement entered into between the parties in the facts and circumstances of the case. C. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts & circumstances of case. D. Cost of the petition may also be awarded.” 3. At the outset, Mr. Bharat, learned Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents submits that the respondent Department has already stayed the NIT in question and as such, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication at this stage. 3 4. In identical petitions i.e. WPC No. 2154 of 2025 (M/s. A.K. Construction & Another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, this Court had disposed of those petitions in the light of the aforesaid submission advanced by the learned Advocate General. 5. Since the NIT issued by the respondent authorities itself have been stayed, the grievance raised in this petition stands redressed and no further adjudication is warranted. Needless to state that if the NIT in question, which has been stayed by the respondent authorities itself, is revived, the petitioners may take recourse to appropriate forum afresh, if so advised. 6. Consequently, the instant petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra