Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
\HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20949 of 2025 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. After some arguments, Sri Rakesh Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition. The relief is accordingly declined. Learned counsel for the petitioner recasts the prayer and submits that he may be given liberty to approach the competent court as per law. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's case covered by the judgement of the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported at (2014) 8 SCC
273. It is always open to the petitioner to avail his legal remedy. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
October 15, 2025 Sachin Mishra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Maurya, Shweta Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Lokendra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad