LAKSHMAN PRASAD v. GYANENDRA SINGH, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
CAPL/4713/2025 · 2025-10-14
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200958 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200958 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4713 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. Sole opposite party has filed compliance affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record. Office to proceed accordingly.
2. Learned Standing Counsel representing sole opposite party states that the order passed by this Court has been complied with and no cause of action survives to maintain the instant contempt application.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has admitted the compliance of the order passed by writ court.
4. As such, the instant contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. October 15, 2025 P.P. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brij Raj Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Dinesh Pathak,J.) Lakshman Prasad .....Applicant(s) Gyanendra Singh, District Magistrate .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- POONAM PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad