HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31652 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Sumit Daga, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Sri Lavkush Singh & Sri Saurabh Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5. 2. The present writ petition has been filed with following prayer: "अस्तु माननीय न्यायालय से सादर पूवर्क ्ऺाथर्ना की जाती है िक सलीम शेख और उसके पिरवार की संपि्तयो की िरपोटर् तलब कर मेरे साष्य को देखते हुये मेरे के स की जांच सी.बी.आई. या ्ऺवतर्न िनदेशालय को दी जाये, खाता सं० 00114 ्षाम अनूपशहर, बांगर, तहसील अनूपशहर, िजला बुलंदशहर खसरा सं0 1234/19 ्षे्ऴफल 1.5810 पर अजय ्षारा गैर कानूनी तिरके से बसाई गई कालोनी औरमेरे ्षारा सलीम शेख की बताई गई संपि्तयो का ्िौरा पेज नं 62 है इस सभी संपि्तयो की उिचत जांच कराने की कृ पा करें। पेिटशनर ्ऺितवादी नं0 5 व 6 के डर से अपने गृह जनपद नहीं जा सकता, उसे अपनी जान माल का खतरा है, अगर मेरे िशकायत करने में कोई गलती की होतो मुझे भी इस के स की अंितम ्ऺि्वया होने तक सरकारी खचरॏ पर इलाहाबाद हाईकोटर् के ्ऺाईवेट सीिनयर एडवोके ट िदवलाने की कृ पा करे। िजससे िक मुझे न्याय िमल सके ।" 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent no. 5 has earned so many properties by illegal means, therefore, an enquiry is required by the C.B.I. or Enforcement Directorate. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that there are private civil and criminal disputes pending between the parties and just to settle the score, present petition has been filed by the petitioner. It is further submitted that alleged illegal property of respondent no. 5 is mentioned at page no. 62 of the writ petition was investigated by Circle Officer, Shikarpur, Buland Shahar, and submitted a report dated 30.12.2021 to S.S.P., Bulandshahar, wherein said allegation was found incorrect, therefore, no enquiry is required Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sumit Daga, In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Lavkush Singh, Prabhakar Awasthi Mohammad Ashraf .....Petitioner(s) Sarkar U. P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) by the C.B.I. or Enforcement Directorate. 5. Confronted with the aforesaid arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is not satisfied with regular investigation proceedings, therefore, matter may be referred to the C.B.I. or Enforcement Directorate for enquiry of alleged property of respondent no. 5. However, he could not dispute the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents. 6. Under such circumstances, no case for interference is made out. 7. The writ petition petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. October 15, 2025 A.P. Pandey WRIC No. 31652 of 2025 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad