Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200956 (ALL)

SANTOSH @ BUNTY v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/9444/2025 · 2025-10-14

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9444 of 2025 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record. 2. The present third bail application has been filed by the applicant in case crime No. 730 of 2022, under Sections 363, 302, 201/34, 364 IPC, police station Etmaddaula, District Agra with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail. The first and second bail applications of applicant were dismissed by this Court vide orders dated 01.05.2023 and 19.04.2024. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that prayer for bail is not being pressed and that applicant is in Jail since 24.10.2022 and that a direction may be made to the trial court to expedite the trial and to conclude the same within a specific time frame. 4. In view of the above, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and to decide the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of ten months from the date of production of copy of the order, provided that there is no legal impediment. 5. The instant third bail application filed on behalf of applicant Santosh alias Bunty is disposed of accordingly. 6. A copy of this order be forwarded to the concerned trial court for necessary compliance. October 15, 2025 A.N. Mishra Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajeev Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vipin Chandra Pandey (Raj Beer Singh,J.) Santosh @ Bunty .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AMARNATH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad