Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15485 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Sri Mahendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner and Mrs. Raj Laxmi, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents.
2. The averments of this writ petition do not co-relate with the prayer sought.
3. Still in the interest of justice, the writ petition is disposed of with observation that in case petitioner has any claim so far as his prayer to grant increment is concerned, he has liberty to approach the concerned respondent by filing a detail representation, on fact as well as on law, who will decide the same in accordance with law. October 15, 2025 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ram Chandra Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad