Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24068 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 2. Applicants seek bail in Case Crime No. 193 of 2025, under Sections 109, 3(5), 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station - Nizamabad, District - Azamgarh, during the pendency of trial. 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the applicants is that though in first information report, allegation of firing have been assigned to all the accused persons but in the statement of the injured Prakash Yadav, the allegation of firing has been assigned to co-accused Sushil Yadav and applicants have been falsely implicated in the instant case. The applicants are law abiding citizens and are languishing in jail since 31.5.2025. Applicant have explained criminal history of one case which is petty in nature. In case, they are granted bail, they will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicants- Pappu Yadav and Dubai Yadav, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satya Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anand Pratap Singh, Aryan Srivastava, G.A., Prakash Chandra Srivastava Pappu Yadav And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicants shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii.
The applicants shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicants shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by them. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicants and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 15, 2025 Vandana BAIL No. 24068 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad