Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200922 (ALL)

DEENANATH SHUKLA v. DR.AMIT BHARDWAJ, DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (HIGHER EDUCATION)

CAPL/3974/2025 · 2025-10-14

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3974 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Opposite party has filed a discharge application supported by compliance affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record. Office to proceed accordingly. 2. Learned Standing Counsel representing opposite party states that the application of the present applicant has been decided in compliance of the order of this Court dated 30.8.2024; therefore, no cause of action survives to maintain the instant contempt application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has admitted the compliance of the order passed by this Court and prayed to dismiss the instant contempt application as infructuous. 4. In this conspectus, as above, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 15, 2025 vinay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sarvesh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Deenanath Shukla .....Applicant(s) Dr.Amit Bhardwaj, Director Of Education (Higher Education) .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad