MADHUBALA RATHORE WIFE OF SHRI RAMPRASAD PANCHOLI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/3186/2025 · 2025-07-03
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20089 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20089 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24429] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3186/2025 Madhubala Rathore Wife Of Shri Ramprasad Pancholi, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of Bhuvneshwari I T I Anand Vihar Colony, Near Swaran Durg Mandir, N. H. 12, Police Station Sadar Tonk, Tehsil And District Tonk. (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, Tonk, District Tonk (Raj).
4. S.H.O. Police Station Kotwali Tonk, District Tonk (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendera Singh Shekhawat, PP For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 03/07/2025
1. Present petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS seeking fair, proper, impartial and expedite investigation as well as arrest the named accused persons and for conduction the investigation by some higher police officer in FIR No. 26/2023 dated 21.01.2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali Tonk, District Tonk for the offences under Section 147, 148, 149, 327, 467, 468, 471, 420, 120-B and 406 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation within a period of seven days before the competent authority.
[2025:RJ-JP:24429] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3186/2025]
3. This Court directs Respondent No. 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same within a period of seven days, strictly in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /59