Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20088 (ALL)

ARJUN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/5820/2025 · 2025-07-17

Avnish Saxena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:117451 Court No. - 87 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5820 of 2025 Applicant :- Arjun Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajat Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rakesh Kumar Garg,Yash Garg Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J. 1. List has been revised. 2. None appeared for the informant. 3. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant-accused Arjun for the offence punishable under Sections 352, 109, 351(2) B.N.S. & Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, & Section 3/25 Arms Act in Case Crime No. 17 of 2025, Police Station- Achhnera, District-Agra. 4. Sri Rajat Kumar Shukla, learned advocate appeared for the applicant and submits that it is a no injury case wherein the accused applicant alongwith other co-accused have been falsely implicated in the case, registered after a delay of a day. It is mentioned in the F.I.R. that 7 to 8 shots have been fired by the accused and other co-accused but the informant did not suffer any injury. The charge sheet has been submitted. The bail of the applicant is rejected by the learned trial court merely due to criminal history of 14 cases. The criminal history has been explained in the supplementary affidavit. In one case, the accused has been acquitted and in 13 cases, he is on bail. It is further submitted that the accused is languishing in jail since January, 2025. As such, he prays that the accused/applicant be enlarged on bail. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and submits that the accused is habitual offender. 6. This court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 7. The perusal of the record prima facie reveals that the charge sheet has been submitted in the matter. It is a no injury case. The co-accused, who has a similar role in the present case, has been granted bail from the trial court. The criminal history has been explained. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since January, 2025. 8. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. Order Date :- 18.7.2025 Shivangi (Avnish Saxena, J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad