HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15176 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. Heard Shri Vivek Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Shri R.S. Agrawal, learned Standing Counsel for the State. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner being fully eligible and qualified in all respects applied in pursuance of a recruitment exercised undertaken by the respondents. However, an FIR came to be lodged on 16.08.2024 bearing Case Crime No.398 of 2024, under Sections 65(1), 351(3) of BNS and Section 3/4 of the POCSO Act. Post to it, he was confined in jail and enlarged on bail. Prayer in the writ petition for consideration of the representation of the writ petitioner for appointment on the post of Prantiya Rakshak Dal. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner is to be examined at the first instance by District Youth Welfare and Prantiya Rakshak Dal Officer, District- Jhansi. Considering the submission so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive report along with self attested copy of the writ petition and a certified copy of the order before the third respondent, who will consider the claim of the writ petitioner from the date of production of certified copy of the order, bearing in mind the status and the outcome of the criminal proceeding within three months. October 15, 2025 Gurpreet Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Sudhir Naayak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GURPREET SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad