Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33078 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the first informant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 120 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 127(2), 3(5) B.N.S., Police Station- Daraganj, District Prayagraj. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that in the FIR as well as in the statement of injured, the allegations have been made against the applicant and other co-accused persons for firing upon the injured but as per the injuries report of the injured, it clear that there is no injury of fire arm and all the injuries are simple contusion and resulted by hard blunt substance. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. He further submitted that the applicant has explained the criminal history of three cases in para 18 of the affidavit and he is languishing in jail since
31.07.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the first informant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6.
Let the applicant- Vimal Mishra involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Singh, Mahendra Pratap Singh, Rohit Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Himanshu Shekhar Tripathi Vimal Mishra .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. 9. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of downloaded copy of this order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. October 15, 2025 A.Kr. BAIL No. 33078 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad