176 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DULI CHAND CONTRACTOR BHANU PARTAP SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Bhat Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel Sandeep, SDP, Public Health, petitioner stands released. In view thereof, same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives, he would be at liberty to raise their claim by filing representation before the quarter concerned within a period of two weeks from the release of payments, which shall be dealt with, thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any delay on the part of respondent, t concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) of Rs.50,000/ his/her own pocket. 20.03.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: DULI CHAND CONTRACTOR Versus BHANU PARTAP SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Raj Kumar Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions from Sandeep, SDP, Public Health, Sirsa submits that the amount payable to the petitioner stands released. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives, he would be at liberty to raise their claim by filing representation before the quarter concerned within a period of two weeks from the release of payments, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any delay on the part of respondent, t concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) of Rs.50,000/ his/her own pocket. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-510-2025 Date of Decision: March 20, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. for the respondent on instructions from Mr. Sirsa submits that the amount payable to the no cause survives in the present petition and the However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives, he would be at liberty to raise their claim by filing representation before the quarter concerned within a period of two weeks from the release of as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any delay on the part of respondent, the officer concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) of Rs.50,000/- to the petitioner from (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No March 20, 2025 Mr. Sirsa submits that the amount payable to the no cause survives in the present petition and the However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives, he would be at liberty to raise their claim by filing representation before the quarter concerned within a period of two weeks from the release of as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner within a period of two weeks he officer to the petitioner from TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.03.21 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document