Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20082 (AP)

CHOPPARAPU RAMAIAH v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/14203/2025 · 2025-06-11

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010281362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 14203/2025 Between: Chopparapu Ramaiah and Others The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GOUTHAMI SURAPAREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 14203/2025 Chopparapu Ramaiah and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): GOUTHAMI SURAPAREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR REVENUE IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. The writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents in proceeding to dispossess the petitioners from the subject land. 3. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the un-official respondent Nos.5 to 10 are excavating the soil from the petitioners land. When approached the respondents, they have stated that they have given permission to the un-official respondent Nos.5 to 10. Thus, approached this Court by way of instant writ petition. 4. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has placed before the Court a copy of the written instructions dated 05.06.2025, from the same it reflects that as soon as the information was received about the illegal excavation of soil, the Village Revenue Officer has visited the place and stopped the illegal excavation of soil and further stated that the respondents never tried to dispossess the petitioners. 5. In view of the foregoing, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA 12.06.2025 MDP