Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2008 (UTT)

SANGEETA UNIYAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/76/2025 · 2025-04-01

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.76 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Lalit Sharma and Ms. Divya Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. J.P. Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Mayank Datta, learned counsel for the private respondent (appeared through V.C.). 4. On instructions, learned State Counsel submits that after investigation, final report has been submitted against the petitioner-Sangeeta Uniyal as no case is found against her. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, nothing remains to be decided in the writ petition. Accordingly, the present writ petition is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 01.04.2025 AK 2