Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2008 (JK)

RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE KOTLIKALABAN AND GALUTHI TH KAMRAN SHAHZAD v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS

WP(C)/335/2025 · 2025-02-18

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S.No. 107 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 335/2025 Residents of Villages Kotli Kalaban, Gulathi …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Rupak Ratta, Advocate. Vs Pyare Lal Sharma and ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 18.02.2025 After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, as the petitioners have not challenged the impugned Allotment Order dated 21.10.2025 issued by the Executive Engineer, REW Rajouri, whereby the contract has been allotted in favour of Mr. Shariq Nissar for construction of Niabet building at Ghambir Mughlan Pyt., Gambhir Mughlan B Block Manjakote under (PRI). When the instant matter was being argued, the petitioner was confronted with the issue of maintainability of the instant petition, as there was no specific challenge to the aforesaid order and the petitioner in the aforesaid backdrop, prays for seeking withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with a view to challenge the aforesaid order. Prayer made is allowed. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn along with connected application, with liberty as prayed for. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge JAMMU 18.02.2025 Ram Krishan Ram Krishan 2025.02.18 03:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document