HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 42232 of 2019 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that cousin brother of petitioner, namely, Intkhab Alam has also filed Writ C No. 42350 of 2019 for quashing the very same orders i.e. orders dated 22.08.2019 and 20.11.2019. He next submitted that aforesaid writ petition was partly allowed vide judgment and order dated 22.02.2023 setting aside orders dated dated 22.08.2019 and 20.11.2019 and remanding the matter back to respondents to decide afresh with certain observations. He next submitted that present controversy is squarely covered with the judgment and order dated 22.02.2023 therefore, this petition may also be allowed in terms of judgment and order dated 22.02.2023 passed in Writ C No. 42350 of 2019. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has not disputed the aforesaid facts. 4. Accordingly, present petition is partly allowed in terms of judgment and order dated 22.02.2023 passed in Writ C No. 42350 of 2019. Impugned orders dated 22.08.2019 and 20.11.2019 are hereby set aside. Matter is relegated to the respondents to decide afresh in light of observations made in judgment and order dated 22.02.2023 passed in Writ C No. 42350 of 2019. October 15, 2025 ADY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Tripathi, Girish Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Firdaus Begum .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad