KESHAVNARAYAN DAS HIRANI S/O SH.NARAYAN DAS HIRANI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/3198/2025 · 2025-05-27
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20076 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20076 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:22312] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3198/2025
1. Keshavnarayan Das Hirani S/o Sh.narayan Das Hirani, R/o Flat No. 402, Bravia Residency, C-Block, Panchsheel Nagar, Ajmer. Presently Resident Of Plot No. 697-B, Bhagwani Bhawan Road, C Road No. 9,sardarpura, District Jodhpur.
2. Rukmani Devi W/o Sh. Keshavnarayan Das Hirani, R/o Flat No. 402, Bravia Residency, C-Block, Panchsheel Nagar, Ajmer. Presently Resident Of Plot No. 697-B, Bhagwani Bhawan Road, C Road No. 9,sardarpura, District Jodhpur.
3. Shailesh S/o Sh. Keshavnarayan Das Hirani, R/o Flat No. 402, Bravia Residency, C-Block, Panchsheel Nagar, Ajmer. Presently Resident Of Plot No. 697-B, Bhagwani Bhawan Road, C Road No. 9,sardarpura, District Jodhpur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Smt. Geeta Devi W/o Sh. Babu Lal Gupta, Aged About 61 Years, R/o D-125-4-D Campus, Murlipura, Sikar Road, Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Kamal Kant Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 27/05/2025
1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed, with a prayer to quash the FIR No. 233/2023 registered at Police Station Ramnagaria, Jaipur City (East) for offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120B of IPC, on the basis of compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute.
[2025:RJ-JP:22312] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-3198/2025]
2.
Learned counsel for both the parties, in presence of their respective clients, have submitted that the dispute at hand is inter-se private in nature, which has been resolved by the parties amicably.
3. Heard and considered.
4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in [2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced below:
“12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the nature of the offence and the fact that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non- compoundable.”
5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition. Compromise is taken on record.
6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 233/2023 registered at Police Station Ramnagaria, Jaipur City (East) with all consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside.
7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
[2025:RJ-JP:22312] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-3198/2025]
8. Appropriate applications be filed before the Investigating Officer and concerned Court for getting the desired original documents; the same be decided expeditiously in accordance with law.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/64