Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200756 (ALL)

UMESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/21717/2025 · 2025-10-14

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21717 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been preferred with the following main prayers:- "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondent no.2 to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner dated 08.08.2025 with regard to the complaint against respondent nos. 4 & 5 and associates pending before him within a short stipulated time period, as may be specified by this Hon'ble Court. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent Police Authority not to harass the petitioner." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has moved a complaint/application to the Police Commissioner, Police Commissionerate, Agra on 08.08.2025 and submitted that the police has not taken any decision/action against respondent nos.4 and 5. He prayed that the Court may direct the Police Commissioner concerned to decide the complaint/application dated 08.08.2025 submitted by the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned AGA appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf the State-respondents submitted that the enquiry has already been conducted by the Police Commissioner, Police Commissionerate, Agra and found that the allegations made by the petitioner in the complaint is not true. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Umesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Learned AGA has placed the written instructions to the Court for perusal, which is taken on record. He has referred paragraph no.14 of the said instructions, which is quoted as under:- "14. इस ्ऺस्तर में अंिकत कथन के संबंध में कथन है िक यािचकाकतार् उपरो्व ्षारा ्शीमान् पुिलस किमश्नर, पुिलस किमश्नरेट आगरा महोदय के कायार्लय से थाना िसकन्दरा किमश्नरेट आगरा पर ्ऺाप्त ्ऺाथर्ना प्ऴ की जांच में आवेदक ्षारा अंिकत आरोपों की पुि्ि होना नहीं पायी गयी है। साथ ही यह भी कथन है िक थाना अलापुर जनपद बदायूँ पुिलस वाद सं0 11931/21 धारा 128 'सीआरपीसी में िगरफ्तारी वारण्ट की तामील हेतु थाना िसकन्दरा किमश्नरेट आगरा उपिस्थत आयी थी तथा अपने साथ यािचकाकतार् उपरो्व को िगरफ्तार कर बदायूँ ले गयी थी।" 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, perused the contents made in writ petition as well as the written instructions submitted by learned AGA nothing has left in this petition for further adjudication. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. October 15, 2025 Atul CRLP No. 21717 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad