Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9794 of 2025 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
2. This application has been filed by the applicant for quashing the summoning order dated 15.06.2022 passed by Prescribed Officer, Additional Court, Jhansi as well as entire criminal proceedings of Complaint Case No. 3005 of 2021 (Satendra Raghuvanshi Vs. Deepak Goyal), under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station Nawabad, District Jhansi, pending in the court of Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No.5, Jhansi.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that cheque of Rs. 25,00,000/- was dishonoured and the applicant is ready to pay the amount in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H., 2010(5) SCC 663.
4. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the applicant, the present application is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to prefer an application for compounding before the court concerned within thirty days from today.
5. In the event, application for compounding is filed, the same shall be considered by the court concerned in light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Damodar S. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Goyal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepak Goyal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Prabhu (supra).
6. For a period of thirty days, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. October 15, 2025 VMA NA528 No. 9794 of 2025 2 (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad